Quantcast The Chronicle


Horowitz sounds off to small crowd

By: Audrey McGowan

Issue date: 4/18/08 Section: News
Last update: 4/18/08 at 7:01 AM EST
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
David Horowitz, a conservative writer and activist, discussed Islamofascism and the Duke lacrosse case in a speech to approximately 50 people Thursday night.
Media Credit: Chase Olivieri
David Horowitz, a conservative writer and activist, discussed Islamofascism and the Duke lacrosse case in a speech to approximately 50 people Thursday night.

In a speech Thursday, David Horowitz criticized the liberal influence within universities like Duke.
Media Credit: Chase Olivieri
In a speech Thursday, David Horowitz criticized the liberal influence within universities like Duke.

Two years since his last visit to Duke, conservative activist David Horowitz was met with little fanfare Thursday night.

With approximately 50 people attending his speech, Horowitz's appearance contrasted his March 2006 visit during which protesting audience members in the front row heckled at several of his statements.

Horowitz came to speak as part of Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week, an event sponsored by the Duke Conservative Union.

"The issue is, there is a global movement within Islam-not representing all or even a majority of Muslims-but there is a fundamentalist movement that wants to take the entire world back to the seventh century," he said.

Much of his discussion of Islamo-Fascism focused on the oppression of women, which he later used to criticize liberals.

"People on the left think that they're changing the world and bringing about a new millennium where there will be no racism or sexism," he said. "People who are described as liberals are generally leftists. Inside every leftist is a totalitarian."

Horowitz said prominent liberals and leaders of Muslim extremists share the same views about America.

"They both believe America is evil," he said.

The liberals' lack of action against Muslim leaders such as Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is comparable to the lack of action against Adolf Hitler in the 1930s, Horowitz said.

"Their agenda is to establish one world under an Islamic caliphate and under Islamic law," he added.

He estimated that about 10 percent of Muslims, or 150 million people, hold these beliefs.

Horowitz also advanced a strong pro-Israel perspective.

"[Palestinian culture] is an evil culture," he said. He added that Palestinians attacked Israel because they wanted to eliminate the Jews, not because they wanted self determination or their own state.

Ahmed Abdel-Wahab, a first-year economics graduate student, said he disagreed with Horowitz's portrayal of the Israel-Palestine conflict.

"He's telling the history of the Middle East and Muslims as if Palestine was an empty country prior to 1948," he said.

Horowitz also inveighed against the Duke faculty who opposed Israel's policy in the Middle East.

"Your anti-Semitic professors call it an occupation," Horowitz said.

Horowitz, who authored "Indoctrinate U: The Left's War Against Academic Freedom" and "The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America," also criticized Duke professors for their reaction to the lacrosse case.

"If the three lacrosse players were black and the drug addicted, criminal prostitute was white, do you think for one second the lacrosse season would have ended?" he asked.

President Richard Brodhead is "spineless" and his administration exists to protect him, Horowitz said. He added that Duke students were deprived of their right to hear multiple perspectives on controversial issues.

"You're being indoctrinated," he said. "You're not being taught."

Student reactions to the speech varied.

President of DCU David Bitner, a sophomore, said he appreciated Horowitz's speech.

"To be able to engage with someone is truly precious from the intellectual perspective," Bitner said.

Horowitz's speech, however, left some students frustrated.

"It's never black and white," said Marie Bouthors, an art history graduate student.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 33

Oh really?

posted 4/18/08 @ 8:32 AM EST

"It's never black and white," said Marie Bouthors, an art history graduate student.
------------------
We'll check back with you after you've been forced to undergo female genitile mutilation. (Continued…)

(2 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Duke Alum

posted 4/18/08 @ 9:58 AM EST

If "it's never black and white"...why did the illustrious Gang of 88 decide the accusations against the lacrosse team were so clear cut and believable without or in spite of the evidence?

This group of professors should have known better and despite the evidence and lies have yet to take responsibility for acting out their agendas on the students, the community. (Continued…)

(2 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Jormungand

posted 4/18/08 @ 11:27 AM EST

I'd like to congratulate Mr. Horowitz and all other believers that absolute good and absolute evil are know-able concepts.

I don't deny that there are certain fanatics who want to destroy this country and its populace, but there are people outside of the nation of Islam who hold this belief as well. (Continued…)

r

posted 4/18/08 @ 11:53 AM EST

As usual, the Chronicle has presented only one side of the story by selecting the most incendiary statements and positing them as representative of Dr. (Continued…)

(4 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

YA

posted 4/18/08 @ 12:21 PM EST

The Chronicle is a joke. Is this story supposed to be objective?

pg

posted 4/18/08 @ 12:34 PM EST

Here's what I don't understand:

Whenever there is a Chronicle article about a controversial issue (particularly conservative issues, it seems) there is a slew of whining comments about how the story isn't fair. (Continued…)

What a Joke

posted 4/18/08 @ 12:58 PM EST

Horowitz was funnier when he was a Leftist, now he's just plain sad.
I was sorry to hear that the first "Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week" ended in failure (what? Senator "Man-Dog love" Santorum and Ann Coulter not given the respect they deserve--how outrageous!). (Continued…)

Rudy

posted 4/18/08 @ 1:57 PM EST

r said:
"As usual, the Chronicle has presented only one side of the story by selecting the most incendiary statements and positing them as representative of Dr. (Continued…)

student

posted 4/18/08 @ 2:07 PM EST

All PC talk aside, who could argue that fundamentalist Muslims want anything besides the extermination of other state power and religions? This article reads like some nut came to Duke to talk about conspiracy theories, and though I can't personally vouch for this speaker's validity, it is clear that the Chronicle has already released its verdict on David Horowitz. (Continued…)

(2 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

sandy

posted 4/18/08 @ 2:37 PM EST

is this article serious? there was at least 80 people there. i always knew folks from the chronicle couldn't write, but who would have thought they couldnt count?

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

The Chronicle's Sports Blog

The Chronicle's Sports Blog

Seven Continents

Welcome to Seven Continents. This blog, written by eight Duke and UNC students across all seven continents, chronicles their journeys around the globe and the lessons they've learned.

Ask the Editor

Editor-in-Chief Chelsea Allison opens up the mailbag.

Poll

Should the drinking age be lowered from 21 to 18?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisements

Advertisement

Front Page PDF

Download Print Edition PDF

Lacrosse Coverage

Ad Supplements