web tracker The Chronicle


38 former laxers to file suit today

University will face third suit in as many months

By: Chelsea Allison

Issue date: 2/21/08 Section: News
Last update: 2/21/08 at 5:58 AM EST
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
Thirty eight of the 47 members of the 2005-2006 men's lacrosse team are expected to sue the University and other parties today, the media representative for their attorney confirmed Wednesday.

The 100-page lawsuit-the third civil suit in as many months against Duke-will be filed by Washington, D.C., attorney Charles Cooper.

A press conference will be held at 1 p.m. at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., with the players and their families, said spokesperson Bob Bork.

He added that a Web site, www.dukelawsuit.com, has been established to provide updates. It will also host the complaint and video from the conference.

Cooper, partner at Cooper and Kirk and a former U.S. assistant attorney general, told Legal Times in an article published last week that he planned to file suit by the end of February.

"We will seek recovery for the treatment-the really shameful treatment-that the players received throughout the ordeal," Cooper said, referring to the will-be plaintiffs' experience after bogus allegations of rape were made against members of their team in March 2006.

The University added former U.S. deputy attorney general Jamie Gorelick to its legal team Feb. 6 to help its defense in ongoing litigations. Gorelick is a partner at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, another Washington, D.C., firm.

Duke is already embroiled in a civil suit filed by an attorney for three other unindicted players. The suit, which alleged the University and others directed a wide conspiracy against the players, was filed in December by Durham attorney Bob Ekstrand.

Former men's lacrosse head coach Mike Pressler filed charges against Duke in January, claiming that the University had violated terms of a confidential financial settlement made after he was forced to resign during the initial fallout from the allegations. He later withdrew those charges and refiled, alleging slander.

Wrongly-indicted former players Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and Dave Evans, Trinity '06, settled with the University for an undisclosed amount in June.

Both Gorelick and John Burness, senior vice president for public affairs and government relations, declined to comment further.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 89

duke parent

posted 2/21/08 @ 8:06 AM EST

"Shameful treatment" is an understatement. Surprised John Burness didn't have a comment - he sure had PLENTY to say before.
Sounds like the players have lined up a very qualified defense team. (Continued…)

(3 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

drsl

Doris

posted 2/21/08 @ 8:24 AM EST

Burness declined to comment? Hell must've frozen over. Nothing that man likes more than to run his mouth. Wonder how much he will end up costing Duke with his untimely and ill-advised and outright ridiculous statments. (Continued…)

watt

posted 2/21/08 @ 8:34 AM EST

I expect that this lawsuit is only being filed with great reluctance, and out of frustration and disappointment that certain members of the Duke administration and faculty have never fully accepted responsibility for their reprehensible actions in 2006. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

BSME69

posted 2/21/08 @ 10:31 AM EST

Until the University publicly rebukes the now entirely discredited statements of the Group of 88, I will hope the best for these lawsuits. Brodhead's wimper was just that -- a weak statement which seemed to be only a personal regret. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Walter Abbott

posted 2/21/08 @ 10:32 AM EST

News release and case summary:

http://www.bork.com//downloads/Duke%20Lawsuit%20news%20release.pdf

http://www.bork.com/downloads/Case%20Summary%202. (Continued…)

pearl

posted 2/21/08 @ 11:05 AM EST

On of the problems at Duke revealed by the lacrosse case is that some members of the administration and faculty have acted imperiously, as though they are accountable to no one, least of all their students, whom they are pledged to serve. (Continued…)

ben

posted 2/21/08 @ 11:33 AM EST

this is ridiculous. if the duke lacrosse team didn't have a bad reputation before, this surely will push them over the edge.
everybody's wanting a little money out of this. (Continued…)

(9 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

cnn

posted 2/21/08 @ 11:36 AM EST

One of the top stories on CNN. Incredible. Brodhead and others: when are you going to freaking resign? You'll still get respondeat superior.

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Matthew Duke '05

posted 2/21/08 @ 12:09 PM EST

Ryan and the three exonerated players have reason to sue Duke; these folks, no. Three words: absurd, sad, and frivolous. That said I'm sure the lawsuit will be a barrel of laughs to read. (Continued…)

(3 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

doris

posted 2/21/08 @ 12:36 PM EST

Hey you students/ former students. I'm a Duke alumna, and I'm pretty ashamed of your nearsightedness. ITS NOT ABOUT THE MONEY! It's about a rogue prosecutor, a rogue university administration, and a rogue city. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

The Chronicle's Sports Blog

The Chronicle's Sports Blog

Read The Chronicle's four-part inteview with Coach K at The Chronicle's Sports Blog, including a series of audio clips.

Ask the Editor

Editor-in-Chief Chelsea Allison opens up the mailbag.

Poll

In which round of the NBA Draft will DeMarcus Nelson be selected?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisements

Advertisement

Front Page PDF

Download Print Edition PDF

Lacrosse Coverage

Ad Supplements