Sex workers showcase 'art' in BC performance
By: Chrissy DiNicola
Issue date: 2/4/08 Section: News
Last update: 2/4/08 at 6:55 AM EST
Last update: 2/4/08 at 6:55 AM EST
|
The Sex Workers' Art Show-a cabaret-style collection of performances by current and former prostitutes, adult-film stars and exotic dancers-riveted a crowd of students and community members in the Bryan Center's Reynolds Theater Sunday night.
Hot pink-haired host and show founder Annie Oakley kicked off the show by leading the audience in a chant of "naked ladies."
The remainder of the event featured political statements, musical theater, a mild dominatrix act, the elaborate removal of clothing and an anal sparkler for the grand finale. Audience member reactions ranged from rowdy cheers to awkward silences.
Junior Martha Brucato spent 11 months raising funds for the free show in hopes of initiating discussions about sexuality and the way women's bodies are often seen as commodities-issues she said are rarely brought up on campus.
"When people are exposed to something so different from what they are used to, it will get them talk about these things," Brucato said.
The Sex Workers' Art Show originated in Olympia, Wash., in 1997 as an annual local event. It is now on its sixth tour, planning to hit 36 venues in 42 days.
Oakley, a former sex worker, founded the show in response to her reactions that her previous job was antifeminist and degrading-assumptions she described as sexist and classist.
Although the performances usually feature more nudity and explicit content, the show was toned down so that a tape could be be sent to the College of William of Mary, a future venue, as proof that it does not include obscenity, Brucato said. The anticipation of the show has aroused controversy, according to media reports.
Brucato added that she was disappointed that she did not see the show in its typical form but said she hopes it will become an annual event at Duke.
Audience member Susan Davis, a junior, said she was impressed by the display of talent. "I liked how it was funny but also introspective," she said.
Abbie Turiansky, a graduate student in public policy, also had a positive reaction to the show, noting that it brought something out of the ordinary to the University.
"Things like this were more common when I was an undergraduate, but it's something Duke students aren't exposed to as much," she said.
Oakley said the show has received overwhelmingly positive feedback, and the majority of negative comments have come from people who have not seen it.
Comparing the sex industry to other industries, Oakley said Americans shun knowing the origins of their goods and services.
"Hearing these stories punctures a mass suspension of disbelief related to the sex industry," she said. "I would love to see a food-service workers' art show, but I doubt that would draw people to theaters."





Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 19
anonymous
posted 2/04/08 @ 10:27 AM EST
How did this outrageous "lipstick-on-a-pig" performance, get sanctioned by Duke officials?
The hand book is clear: "strippers may not be invited or paid to perform at events sponsored by individual students, residential living groups, or cohesive units. (Continued…)
Duke Parent
posted 2/04/08 @ 11:19 AM EST
The hypocrisy by the Duke Adminstration, faculty and some of the 'womens discussion groups' to hold this forum is beyond ridiculious.
Ken
posted 2/04/08 @ 11:42 AM EST
This article needs photos.
LER '09
anonymous
posted 2/04/08 @ 2:17 PM EST
"The Sex Worker's Art Show is not simply a display of those in the sex industry... but an active force in articulating, shaping, and contesting the meaning of the identity "sex worker" in the public sphere. (Continued…)
Scrambled Eggs
posted 2/04/08 @ 2:23 PM EST
There's no reason why Duke should prohibit this sort of event. The "sex workers" participate voluntarily, and no one is forced to attend. It may be silly and coarse, but adults should be entitled to be silly and coarse. (Continued…)
Rudy
posted 2/04/08 @ 2:32 PM EST
Anony @2:17 said:
"Second, what is perversion to some may be art to others."
That is the point of those who point out the hypocrisy, silly. Just because YOU (or the administration) find stripper shows in one form perverted and in another form not doesn't justify their regulation. (Continued…)
Anon
posted 2/04/08 @ 2:45 PM EST
"The show was sponsored by the following official university departments, centers and student organizations: the Duke Women's Center, the Duke Student Health Center, the Healthy Devils, the Program for the Study of Sexualities, the Campus Council, the Women's Studies Department, the University and Cultural Fund, Students for Choice, Students for Choice and the Sexual Assault Support Services. (Continued…)
Jay Man
posted 2/04/08 @ 4:38 PM EST
DUKE U DOES IT AGAIN: SEX WORKER PERFORMACE ON CAMPUS
Incredibly, on Sunday, February 4, 2008, DUKE UNIVERSITY actually PAID for a sex worker "cabaret". (Continued…)
Locomotive Breath
posted 2/04/08 @ 4:51 PM EST
Will the students who attended be getting a notice of suspension shortly? Or are officially-sanctioned university-funded stripper parties OK? So maybe the problem with the lacrosse team was an administrative oversight where they failed to properly register their stripper party with university officials?
Jay Man
posted 2/04/08 @ 5:14 PM EST
DUKE U DOES IT AGAIN: SEX WORKER PERFORMACE ON CAMPUS
Incredibly, on Sunday, February 4, 2008, DUKE UNIVERSITY actually PAID for a sex worker "cabaret". (Continued…)
Post a Comment