Blue Devils still recruit among elite
By: Meredith Shiner
Issue date: 10/17/07 Section: M Basketball
Last update: 10/17/07 at 7:02 AM EST
Last update: 10/17/07 at 7:02 AM EST
- Page 1 of 1
| |
|
Meredith Shiner: Several media outlets are saying that one of Monroe's priorities was finding a program that develops NBA caliber big men. Is there a perception out there that Duke can't do that?
Dave Telep: It doesn't matter what the perception is. The bottom line is that Duke develops NBA-caliber players. When you talk about converting their top-100 guys into NBA Draft picks, Duke does that as well as anybody. I think it's one of the bigger fallacies. Duke lands so many high-profile guys, they all possibly can't become NBA players.
MS: Do you think it's a recruiting disadvantage to not have Midnight Madness?
DT: I think Midnight Madnesses are going to come back because programs are starting to use them nationally to attract underclassmen. I don't think it's necessarily a disadvantage if you don't have a Midnight Madness, but I think it's becoming too much of an advantage when you have one. I think that's something that [Duke will] take a look at going forward.... I'm a proponent of Midnight Madness because I think you can bring young guys into campus and get them excited.
MS: Does Duke need to rethink the way it recruits and start casting a larger net into the pool of talent as opposed to focusing in on one main target?
DT: I think how they're doing it is perfectly fine.
When a program targets a select number of guys, it comes with certain advantages and disadvantages, The advantage is the personal attention that a Hall of Fame and an Olympic basketball coach can give a player is enormous, and it creates a unique bond between that recruit and that head coach. Unfortunately you're not going to get everybody. There's a disadvantage of losing guys. What happens is when you lose a guy at this stage of the game, because the recruiting calendar has been turned up so quickly, five or six years ago, you would have a nice B, C or D option, but because the calendar is so far in advance those options don't exist right now.
MS: Is there anyone Duke will go after specifically now to try to fill in the space in the frontcourt?
DT: That's why they got Olek Czyz.
When you miss on a guy like Greg Monroe, you just can't go after another Greg Monroe now. So you start planning for 2009. You keep your ears to the pavement in case someone pops in '08, but there's no one in the country who commits the No. 1 player and then has a nice fall-back option. It just doesn't work that way like it did 10 years ago. The landscape of the whole thing has changed.






Viewing Comments 1 - 6 of 7
Steven
posted 10/17/07 @ 10:47 PM EST
I think Duke's recruiting problems--and I do think there definitely is a serious problem--are the result of two key factors. On the one hand I believe the general perception of negativity that enveloped the University duriing the lacrosse fiasco continues to this day, though certainly not to the extent that it did at the height of the storm. (Continued…)
Edgar Banks
posted 10/18/07 @ 9:30 AM EST
Steven, the 2 reasons you list as problems for Duke basketball recruiting are in my mind, absurd. The lacross case was indeed a mess with the publicity causing the biggest problem. (Continued…)
Jack
posted 10/18/07 @ 11:55 AM EST
Edgar I second you notion that Duke's recruiting failures have not been due to the LAX fiasco and Coack K's involvement with USA Basketball. The bottom line is very simple. (Continued…)
charlieyca
posted 10/18/07 @ 11:58 AM EST
I agree that to some extent coach k coaching team USA does hurt his recruiting, But it also helps. Who would not want to play for the coach of what is supposed to be the greatest basketball team in the world. (Continued…)
Pat
posted 10/22/07 @ 4:14 PM EST
The reason we didn't get Monroe is much simpler. We have an under six foot white guy as a big man coach and - not coincidentally - our record of developing big men since Pete Gaudet left is horrible. (Continued…)
wilko
posted 10/26/07 @ 11:14 AM EST
Hi Pat,
While I would agree on the surface your comment has merrit, I think brand, boozer and battier poke holes in your arguement. If you had narrowed the scop to say 5 yrs then it would be harder to refute. (Continued…)
Post a Comment