Quantcast The Chronicle
College Media Network


Some laud decision; others question timing, sincerity

news analysis

By: Chelsea Allison

Issue date: 10/1/07 Section: News
Last update: 10/1/07 at 6:27 AM EST
The apology that President Richard Brodhead made at the School of Law Saturday marked one of the few occassions he spoke publicly about the lacrosse case.
Media Credit: Chronicle file photo
The apology that President Richard Brodhead made at the School of Law Saturday marked one of the few occassions he spoke publicly about the lacrosse case.

A standing ovation, amplified for many by a year's worth of tension and waiting, met the apology to the lacrosse players and their families President Richard Brodhead delivered Saturday at the School of Law.

Brodhead's remarks made up just 15 minutes of a two-day conference called "The Court of Public Opinion: The Practice and Ethics of Trying Cases in the Media." But for some, his words were perhaps the most significant of the entire event.

Brodhead's original involvement in the conference had been canceled, and he was not expected to be a part of the programming until a month ago, when he asked to speak after the lacrosse panel, said Kathryn Bradley, senior lecturing fellow at the School of Law and chair of the conference steering committee.

"Although the conference was planned without [his address], I think it was exactly the right place and the right time," she said.

Others, however, said although the conference may have set an appropriate tone, the timing was off.

"I thought it was appropriate that President Brodhead would apologize for the failure of the leadership, but it was well over a year late," Jay Bilas, Trinity '86 and Law '92, told The Chronicle Sunday.

Bilas wrote a letter in June to the editor of Duke Magazine, Robert Bliwise, which recently appeared on the magazine's Web site. The letter called for the resignation of both Brodhead and the chair of the Board of Trustees, Robert Steel, Trinity '73.

"The vast majority of his words and actions, and in many cases his silence, emphasized an aura of guilt of the students and of the University," the letter reads. "From the beginning, President Brodhead abdicated his responsibility as Duke's leader to stand up for fairness and truth."

But John Burness, vice president for government affairs and public relations, said Brodhead had been seeking an opportunity to make such a statement for some time.

Burness added that the timing of Brodhead's apology was independent of last week's announcement that several lacrosse families had hired attorney Charles Cooper, which sparked rumors that the University could soon face a lawsuit.
Page 1 of 3 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 17

Frank (Sonny) Sorrell, '56

posted 10/01/07 @ 9:07 AM EST

Courage and leadership are shown instantaneously when the fight begins, not eighteen months later. Everyone of us are a John Wayne once the indians have left the battleground. (Continued…)

Duke Family

posted 10/01/07 @ 9:55 AM EST

An interested person posted these questions at a Duke graduate's blog titled John in Carolina : 1) Why did Duke advise the lacrosse players not to tell their parents about events of that infamous evening and why did it advise them not retain counsel. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

good questions

posted 10/01/07 @ 11:21 AM EST

As much as Broadhead has screwed up, there are some things which I think we might want to recognize so that they can be changed, and these questions above strike a bunch of them:

1) Duke should have guidelines for students, faculty, and staff in situations like this. (Continued…)

(2 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Hershel Parker

Hershel Parker

posted 10/01/07 @ 1:18 PM EST

Sonny Sorrell is right.

Everyone has had time to analyze Brodhead's speech now. The best rhetorical examination I have seen is Michael Gaynor's "Duke Case: The Brodhead Apology. (Continued…)

(3 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Ken Larrey

posted 10/01/07 @ 2:05 PM EST

Well actually the lawsuit wasn't the only situation to which I was referring.

-Ken Larrey

John Steed

posted 10/01/07 @ 2:35 PM EST

Good morning again, 'Anonymous' poster (1:43 & 1:45) known far and wide as Brodhead's Secretary.

In a confusing world where "facts keep changing" (copyright R. (Continued…)

why now?

posted 10/01/07 @ 3:45 PM EST

The timing for an apology that brodhead gave should have been right after the proclamation of innocent by the AG, and given to the parents. One who cannot make decisions will wait for a convenient time such as a conference about a different subject than apologies and then state that much of him wishes the whole thing will be forgotten. (Continued…)

Ken Larrey

posted 10/01/07 @ 4:48 PM EST

A few mistakes in "quoting" me. You paraphrased me, you didn't quote me. I did not use the word "ordered" and I certainly did not say "ordered" unequivocally. (Continued…)

Alum8284

posted 10/01/07 @ 6:43 PM EST

"But John Burness, vice president for government affairs and public relations, said Brodhead had been seeking an opportunity to make such a statement for some time. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Duke Alum

posted 10/02/07 @ 11:40 AM EST

Burness appears to be continuing the saga of Duke administration ineptness. One who should be well-versed in public affairs should understand that you do not wait for the right moment to apologize, you create the right moment - that is the sign of leadership. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

Should the drinking age be lowered from 21 to 18?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisements

Advertisement

Front Page PDF

Download Print Edition PDF

Ad Supplements