Quantcast The Chronicle
College Media Network


Johnson chastises, lauds lax case actors

By: Shuchi Parikh

Issue date: 9/12/07 Section: News
Last update: 9/12/07 at 6:57 AM EST
  • Page 1 of 1
KC Johnson, a professor at Brooklyn College and prominent lacrosse-case blogger, speaks Tuesday in Page Auditorium.
Media Credit: LARSA AL -OMAISHI
KC Johnson, a professor at Brooklyn College and prominent lacrosse-case blogger, speaks Tuesday in Page Auditorium.

Former lacrosse case defense lawyer Brad Bannon listens to KC Johnson's speech in Page Auditorium.
Media Credit: SARA GUERRERO
Former lacrosse case defense lawyer Brad Bannon listens to KC Johnson's speech in Page Auditorium.

KC Johnson, a man students might otherwise only know through the Internet, appeared in person on Duke's campus Tuesday night.

Johnson, a history professor at Brooklyn College and author of the "Durham-in-Wonderland" blog, spoke to students, faculty, administrators and Durham residents yesterday about procedural violations in the Duke lacrosse case.

The event-co-sponsored by Duke Students for an Ethical Duke and the Program on Values and Ethics in the Marketplace-attracted an audience that filled approximately one-third of Page Auditorium.

Johnson's well-read blog criticizes members of the Duke administration and faculty and the Durham Police Department for their conduct during the case.

"This case revealed a fundamental and deep-seated failure in the criminal justice system well beyond [former district attorney Mike] Nifong," Johnson said. He added that the misconduct of key members of the justice system dictated the case's direction even before Nifong took control.

Johnson praised the players' defense attorneys for their work in the case, which was followed by an applause from the audience. Defense attorneys Brad Bannon, Butch Williams and Bill Thomas were present at the event.

Reading excerpts from an advertisement signed by 88 Duke professors, Johnson said the ad clearly placed guilt on the lacrosse players and criticized those faculty members.

The ad was drafted March 26, 2006, and ran in The Chronicle April 6, 2006, a period during which two of the highest profile protests against the lacrosse team took place, he said. He noted that because of its timing, the ad served as a "thank you" or a form of endorsement for the protests.

"Those protestors might have deserved many things," he said. "A public thank you from the 88 professors was not one of them."

Furthermore, the ad was nearly unprecedented in academic institutions as faculty members rarely come together to make a political statement, Johnson said.

He added that the incident demonstrates a "groupthink" behavior in those academic departments at the University, which are thus not "pedagogically balanced."

President Richard Brodhead showed an early lack of support for the lacrosse team as a result of the pressure he received from the ad signatories, Johnson said.

"[Brodhead] recognized as a college president that forcefully confronting these faculty would be very hazardous to his professional health," he added.

Johnson said, however, there was a lot of support for the lacrosse team from student groups-like Duke Students for an Ethical Durham and Duke Student Government-as well as from other faculty members, particularly law professor James Coleman.

In response to a question from an audience member about the proposed $30-million settlement between the lacrosse players and the city of Durham, Johnson said he was not surprised by the price of the settlement. He added that he believes there is a strong case for it, and he said he hopes it will yield significant reform in the city's justice system.

Senior Kenny Larrey, who organized the event, said he thought the turnout was good but added that many of his fliers advertising the event had been taken down yesterday.

The speech was preceded by a book sale and signing of Johnson and journalist Stuart Taylor's "Until Proven Innocent"-a book about the incident released this month.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 18

dude

posted 9/12/07 @ 8:57 AM EST

Way to go KC! Nothing like a little sunhine as a good disinfectant. Will the 88 ever apologize? Don't they realize how bad they look!

duke 95

posted 9/12/07 @ 10:07 AM EST

Some things bear repeating...

Let's get serious. KC Johnson is an academic hack ­ yes, he has a few books, but as a diplomatic historian, he has had negligible impact on the field. (Continued…)

(5 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Newsday Review

posted 9/12/07 @ 10:31 AM EST

Only a portion of the glowing reviews KC Johnson & Taylor's book on the Duke disaster have already received.

Duke of all has his say

Nearly everyone connected with the Duke lacrosse case has heard of K. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Chicago Tribune Review

posted 9/12/07 @ 10:32 AM EST

[excerpt]

[...] That narrative comes through with painful clarity in a new book, "Until Proven Innocent: Political Correctness and the Shameful Injustices of the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case," co-authored by Stuart Taylor, a National Journal columnist and Newsweek contributor, and K. (Continued…)

W.S. Journal Review

posted 9/12/07 @ 10:33 AM EST

At Duke, the Massacre of Innocence
By ABIGAIL THERNSTROM


Privileged, rowdy white jocks at an elite, Southern college, a poor, young black stripper, and an alleged rape: It was a juicy, made-for-the-media story of race, class and sex, and it was told and retold for months with a ferocious, moralistic intensity. (Continued…)

Truth Shall Set You Free

posted 9/12/07 @ 10:35 AM EST

Praise for Until Proven Innocent includes the following, from a diverse array of people and organizations:

John Grisham: "Brutally honest, unflinching, exhaustively researched, and compulsively readable, Until Proven Innocent excoriates those who led the stampede--the prosecutor, the cops, the media--but it also exposes the cowardice of Duke's administration and faculty. (Continued…)

Last Word

posted 9/12/07 @ 10:43 AM EST

Guilty in the Duke Case
Washington Post

One night in jail: So concludes the Duke lacrosse rape case -- rape fraud, as it turned out. The legacy of this incident should include hard thinking about the deep pathologies underlying the media sensationalism and the perversion of academic ideals that this fraud inspired. (Continued…)

Mike Lee

posted 9/12/07 @ 11:10 AM EST

It seems as though Duke Alum 95 cannot decide if KC Johnson is a racist or simply greedy. What I'd like to know (and what the alleged alum fails to mention at all) is what exactly KC Johnson has gotten wrong. (Continued…)

CHRIS DAVIS

posted 9/12/07 @ 12:12 PM EST

I love it!! Duke Alum 95 reminds me of all the idiots at my Harvard dining hall: if they couldn't win an argument based on fact, no problem, impugn the character of the other side!! Let the ad hominem attacks rip!! Say anything, just anything, to win the day, even in the face of good reviews from almost all of America's major publications. (Continued…)

Duke07 Mom

posted 9/12/07 @ 1:33 PM EST

Thank you KC for your hard work in this case. Your outstanding effort helped Dave, Reade, and Collin and their families. Please know how much we appreciate you. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement



Read the current issue online



Also in this issue:


Advertisement

Become a fan or join our group discussion on Facebook today!


Read the current issue online




Ad Supplements

Senior Ad