Quantcast The Chronicle
College Media Network


Admins praise dismissal, stand by response to case

By: David Graham

Issue date: 4/12/07 Section: News
Last update: 4/12/07 at 6:13 AM EST
  • Page 1 of 1
President Richard Brodhead released a statement Wednesday praising the decision to drop all of the remaining charges in the lacrosse case.
Media Credit: LAUREN PRATS
President Richard Brodhead released a statement Wednesday praising the decision to drop all of the remaining charges in the lacrosse case.

In June 2006, Robert Steel,  Richard Brodhead and Joe Alleva announce the reinstatement of the lacrosse team.
Media Credit: Jianghai Ho
In June 2006, Robert Steel, Richard Brodhead and Joe Alleva announce the reinstatement of the lacrosse team.

As local and national media focused on high-profile press conferences in Raleigh Wednesday, University officials released several statements about the dismissal of the lacrosse case charges.

President Richard Brodhead made a statement Wednesday afternoon "welcoming" North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper's decision to drop charges against former men's lacrosse players Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and David Evans. Director of Athletics Joe Alleva also released a statement.

Additionally, Robert Steel, chair of the Board of Trustees, sent an e-mail to students, faculty, staff, alumni and parents late Wednesday. The message echoed Cooper's criticism of Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong.

"Many have suffered from his actions, these three students and their families most of all," wrote Steel, Trinity '73. "The attorney general's investigation places responsibility for this miscarriage of justice with the district attorney, and we now look to the proceedings of the state bar to call him to account before his peers."

Steel defended both the University's insistence on allowing the legal process to run its course and Brodhead's handling of the case, stating that the president had consulted the Trustees all along and had their full support.

"As we look back-and with the benefit of what we now know-there is no question that there are some things that might have been done differently," Steel wrote. "However, anyone critical of President Brodhead should be similarly critical of the entire Board."

John Burness, senior vice president for government affairs and public relations, said it was unusual for the chair of the Board to send an e-mail to the entire University community.

He added that, to his knowledge, such a message was last sent after Brodhead's selection as president in 2003.

"It is not common, but everything about this case was uncommon," Burness said. "It shows the seriousness with which the Board views this case."

He added that the attorney general's statement Wednesday had been the primary impetus for the message.

Brodhead noted in his statement that Cooper had clearly stated that the players were innocent and had not been let off on a technicality. He added that the University would use the case as a learning experience.

"During the past year, the world has known these young men, their teammates and a great university largely through the filter of unproven allegations," Brodhead said. "I trust that today's decision will begin a new day for all involved."

Neither Brodhead nor Steel offered an apology for any University decision in the case. Brodhead and others have come under sharp criticism from some groups-particularly in the blogosphere-for not being more supportive of the indicted players.

Some commentators have also speculated that the players might sue Duke after charges were dropped.

In an interview with The Chronicle Wednesday afternoon, Brodhead said he was not immediately concerned about the possibility of legal action. "This isn't a day when I'm thinking about lawsuits," he said. "This is a day when I'm thinking about relief at the end of this long ordeal."

In his statement, Alleva said he was proud of the lacrosse team's handling of the situation since last March and expressed his sympathy for the three players.

"I cannot imagine what they have experienced and truly hope that they understand the depth of our concern throughout the ordeal," Alleva said.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 78

RESERVED

posted 4/12/07 @ 7:39 AM EST

THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR THE APOLOGY OF RICHARD BRODHEAD.

(3 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Geoff

posted 4/12/07 @ 7:41 AM EST

How about an apology to the fired coach? Or do they not regret firing him?

(3 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

TooPoopedToPop

posted 4/12/07 @ 8:00 AM EST

Way to go Prof. Broverman, you're one classy chick to once again demonstrate in the national press that you hate all of us --

"Since we haven't gone through a normal legal process, we don't know what really happened," said Duke biology professor Sheryl Broverman. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

I will not forget

posted 4/12/07 @ 8:11 AM EST

Let's not forget that Duke University issued a FALSE press release stating that Coach Pressler "resigned."

And remember that Brodhead said the resignation was "highly appropriate. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Where did Broverman speak

posted 4/12/07 @ 8:19 AM EST

Sherryl Broverman is as fuzzy liberal as it gets. Housed in the biology department, she expresses her main research interest this way:

"How inclusion of civic issues, international connections, and social engagement alters the cognitive and affective responses of non- major science students to science education. (Continued…)

avid reader

posted 4/12/07 @ 8:35 AM EST

The letter from Chairman Steel is particularly opprobrious. Coach Pressler was fired; Duke University put out a news release with a lie, saying he deserted his team and quit. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

tknight

posted 4/12/07 @ 8:59 AM EST

The debate about Pressler is stupid. There certainly have been many situations where a person alleges they were fired and the employer states he or she resigned. (Continued…)

Todd

posted 4/12/07 @ 9:09 AM EST

I can't believe Pressler had a press conference yesterday? Was it to discuss his principled leadership of the Bryant U lacrosse squad?

Assuming no charges of rape or sex abuse had ever been alleged that night, did anyone ever ask him what he would have done once he learned his team leaders held such a party? Pulled them for the rest of the season? Cancelled the rest of the season?

Or nothing? That would be my guess. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

To Locomotive Breath

posted 4/12/07 @ 9:45 AM EST

Read what you wrote. Who is the coach here? Others were supposed to be the conduit of information to the coach about his players? So he seems them daily almost and he doesn't know what's going on with them, and other low level admins are supposed to report it to him? Not logical?

Also, I like Todd's question above. (Continued…)

(4 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Dr. David C. Lukowitz

posted 4/12/07 @ 9:51 AM EST

Would the Chronicle kindly print the names of the 88 faculty members who rushed to judgment? These jerks deserve to be named and shamed. What astounds me is that, as a emeritus professor of history at a midwestern university, that faculty would treat three of their OWN students in such a contemptible manner. (Continued…)

(4 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement



Read the current issue online



Also in this issue:


Advertisement

Become a fan or join our group discussion on Facebook today!


Read the current issue online




Ad Supplements

Senior Ad