Quantcast The Chronicle
College Media Network


They Found 88 Problems, and the Dancer Was Just One

By: Steve Veres

Issue date: 3/8/07 Section: Features
Last update: 3/23/07 at 2:33 PM EST
  • Print
  • Email
NDER SIEGE  The 88 professors became national celebrities against their will after publishing the
Media Credit: Peter Gebhard
NDER SIEGE The 88 professors became national celebrities against their will after publishing the "Social Disaster" Ad in The Chronicle.

This is their story.

This is the story of professors who tried to listen to their students and sparked a shouting match that overpowered any original statement.

This is the story of how an 832-word advertisement in a student newspaper sparked thousands of vitriolic, misogynist and racist e-mails and became a national media spectacle.

This is the story of how faculty received phone calls in the middle of the night, endured mail fraud and overcame death threats for speaking out.

Related Towerview Stories: - The Virtual Support Team
- Actual Text: The Listening Statement
- Discuss on the message boards

Many view the "Group of 88"--as the signatories were eventually dubbed by bloggers--as a symbol of the community prejudging the lacrosse team. Of the out-of-touch ideals of academia. Of hate.

They have been accused of damaging the very same campus culture they intended to address, of forcing President Richard Brodhead to cancel the remaining games of the lacrosse season, of spurring District Attorney Mike Nifong to indict.

How did it reach this point?

"When you take a political stance, this is what happens sometimes-people resist that," says Diane Nelson, associate professor of cultural anthropology. "None of us want pity."

"I, for one, did not think through all of the unintended consequences, nor did I believe almost a year later it would be dissected in the Chronicle of Higher Education and the subject of such acrimony," says Lee Baker, another associate professor of cultural of anthropology and chair of the Arts and Sciences Council.

"The underlying issues about heavy drinking, the partying culture, the attitudes toward women and the racial divisions on campus and between the University and many people in the town, are by no means unique to Duke," Professor of Philosophy David Wong says. "But they raise questions as to who we are as a university community."
Page 1 of 7 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 64

lynp

posted 3/10/07 @ 5:02 PM EST

I do not believe for one second that the 88 received hateful, etc emails and phone calls. They are lying. The best defense has always been a good offense. (Continued…)

(7 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Clapton

posted 3/10/07 @ 5:12 PM EST

We, the critics of the 88, are turning up the volume in a moment when some of the most vulnerable among us are being asked to quiet down. To those who have sent e-mails to the 88, criticized them in public, and exposed their lack of academic qualifications, thank you for making your voices heard and for not waiting. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Gary Packwood

posted 3/10/07 @ 6:09 PM EST

Oh, what a tangled web we weave, When first we practise to deceive.

Sir Walter Scott (1771-1832)

James Brown

posted 3/10/07 @ 6:21 PM EST

The Duke 3 are STILL under indictment for crimes for which they could be jailed for 30 years. There parents have easily spent one million each - money they don't have. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Clapton

posted 3/10/07 @ 7:49 PM EST

"No-one is really talking about how to keep the 88 themselves central to this conversation, how to keep their (in)humanity before us..."

Lest we forget. (Continued…)

SeaDragon

posted 3/10/07 @ 7:54 PM EST

"I haven't heard any professors from the infamous Group of 88 calling for the dismissal of all charges.

"Until that happens I have nothing but disdain for those professors. (Continued…)

Ann Jandlnn

posted 3/10/07 @ 9:05 PM EST

To Nelson: What are you talking about? Whose voice are you speaking for? Your own students that were charged with rape, kidnapping, and sexual offense were the only students that really needed your help. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

sara

posted 3/10/07 @ 9:17 PM EST

The 88ers are right! There is racism on the campus and it is in power. It gathered up a mob of professors to condemn a rape that did not happen and condemn the accused by their race, sex and presumed class stereotypes. (Continued…)

SeaDragon

posted 3/10/07 @ 9:33 PM EST

Another question about Duke's support for its students: was somebody helping the frame-up by illegally using the Duke email system?

Early on, somebody sent a phony email saying a player was about to confess (the player whose email account was used was in class at the time and didn't send the email);

Somebody 'tipped' the DPD to the McFadyen quip from 'American Psycho'. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

SAVANT

posted 3/10/07 @ 9:58 PM EST

A year later and they are still the victims and still on the attack.

These people are proof that there is some sort of learning disabilty linked to identity politics. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement



Read the current issue online



Also in this issue:


Advertisement

Become a fan or join our group discussion on Facebook today!


Read the current issue online




Ad Supplements

Senior Ad