2008 Woodie Awards
The CCI Report
Guest column
By: Richard Brodhead
Issue date: 2/28/07 Section: Columns
Last update: 2/28/07 at 8:15 AM EST
Last update: 2/28/07 at 8:15 AM EST
- Page 1 of 2 next >
I have now received the report of the Campus Culture Initiative Steering Committee. It is the result of 10 months of intensive work by faculty, students, alumni and administrators led by Vice Provost and Dean of Trinity College Robert Thompson (chair) and Vice President for Student Affairs Larry Moneta (vice-chair). I am grateful to the committee, as well as to the President's Council chaired by former trustees Roy Bostock and Wilhelmina Reuben-Cooke, for providing advice on the report's recommendations.
The committee and I hope that this document will launch a conversation, one in which all members of the Duke family are invited to participate. The questions for this conversation are deeply important: how can we create a Duke where every student will get the richest development of his or her personal powers while contributing to and benefiting from the larger community? How can we strengthen the values of inclusion, respect and mutual engagement? How can we build on what's already excellent to make the best Duke we can imagine? Not everyone will agree on the details of every answer, but we need to recognize the value of the questions and have the courage to ask them. In so doing, we continue a healthy Duke tradition of being willing to face up to hard questions in candid ways.
The report focuses on undergraduate culture since that is our principal residential population. Many of the issues the report highlights are challenges on every campus. That does not mean we should ignore them here. Other issues are more Duke-specific.
In some areas, we have already begun to make progress on issues raised in the report. The DukeEngage initiative announced two weeks ago will make major opportunities for civic engagement available to every undergraduate. Plans are already in hand to increase faculty-student interaction by adding faculty residences to West Campus. Athletics is a proud Duke tradition, and I look forward (as the report does) to our strong continuing participation in Division I competition, and to striving jointly for athletic and academic achievement. Getting the balance right requires fine tuning and knowledgeable faculty advice to the administration and trustees, who have final oversight of athletics policy. A major revision of the Athletic Council that has been vetted by ECAC and approved by the trustees will make its deliberations more substantive.
The committee and I hope that this document will launch a conversation, one in which all members of the Duke family are invited to participate. The questions for this conversation are deeply important: how can we create a Duke where every student will get the richest development of his or her personal powers while contributing to and benefiting from the larger community? How can we strengthen the values of inclusion, respect and mutual engagement? How can we build on what's already excellent to make the best Duke we can imagine? Not everyone will agree on the details of every answer, but we need to recognize the value of the questions and have the courage to ask them. In so doing, we continue a healthy Duke tradition of being willing to face up to hard questions in candid ways.
The report focuses on undergraduate culture since that is our principal residential population. Many of the issues the report highlights are challenges on every campus. That does not mean we should ignore them here. Other issues are more Duke-specific.
In some areas, we have already begun to make progress on issues raised in the report. The DukeEngage initiative announced two weeks ago will make major opportunities for civic engagement available to every undergraduate. Plans are already in hand to increase faculty-student interaction by adding faculty residences to West Campus. Athletics is a proud Duke tradition, and I look forward (as the report does) to our strong continuing participation in Division I competition, and to striving jointly for athletic and academic achievement. Getting the balance right requires fine tuning and knowledgeable faculty advice to the administration and trustees, who have final oversight of athletics policy. A major revision of the Athletic Council that has been vetted by ECAC and approved by the trustees will make its deliberations more substantive.
Be the first to comment on this story